ABC doesn’t sound happy with the Board of Appeals’ decision

Note: the AlcoholIc Beverage Control Board of Appeals – a separate division from ABC - has responded to the Board's Aug. 16 finding that ABC's rulings against two Plaza bars were "harsh" and "excessive."

ABC's statement:

“The ABC has received the Appeals Board ruling on the matter concerning two bars in Arcata, Toby & Jack’s and Sidelines, which orders the ABC’s Director to reconsider the ABC’s revocation of these licenses. The ABC established, and the Appeals Board upheld, that drug crimes were committed in the two bars that put people in danger, and that these crimes, which included the sale of MDMA methamphetamine and cocaine, were facilitated and permitted by the management and employees of the establishments. The ABC is still reviewing the Appeals Board decision, after which it will act in accordance with its obligation to ensure public safety and provide licensees with due process.”

The story on the appeals board's findings:

An impressionistic view of Arcata's famed Tavern Row, where the Sidelines and Toby and Jack's are located, by Union Editor Jack Durham.

Judge's decision deemed 'exceptionally harsh', 'clearly excessive'

Kevin L. Hoover
Mad River Union

ARCATA – The state's Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Appeals Board considers the penalties assessed against bar owner Sal Costanzo too harsh, and has called for their reconsideration.

Sidelines and Toby & Jack's, both owned by Costanzo's Genco Olive Oil Company, Inc., were charged by ABC with employee drug dealing based on a 10-month investigation in 2017 and 2018. Suspension of both bars' liquor licenses was recommended following a four-day administrative hearing in Eureka last year. The ruling was upheld by ABC's director.

After hearing the appeals of both cases  on Aug. 16, the Appeals Board has decided that the administrative law judge who heard the cases didn't sufficiently consider Costanzo's "long history of licensure" and his comprehensive response to the violations in deciding the penalty.

States the Appeals Board in the Toby and Jack's case, "Accordingly, we believe it constitutes an abuse of discretion to disregard this substantial mitigating factor and other efforts undertaken by appellant such as: terminating the offending employees, removing Ms. Costanzos as an officer of the corporation, increasing training for employees, increasing security measures, and installing surveillance cameras."

Concludes the board, "Fundamental fairness and the ends of substantial justice require that the Department reconsider the penalty imposed in this matter in order to consider why the above-mentioned factors would not have afforded some measure of mitigation, such as the ability to sell the business and transfer the license. the decision of the Department is hereby remanded for reconsideration of the penalty in light of the above discussion."

9782ABC Appeals Board decision on Toby & Jacks, Aug. 16, 2019 by Mad River Union on Scribd

In its ruling on the Sidelines, he board states that, "While the penalty here is technically within the bounds of the Department's discretion, we note that it is exceptionally harsh... Accordingly, we believe it is so clearly excessive that any reasonable person would find it to be an abuse of discretion in light of all the circumstances." The board also calls for reconsideration of the Sidelines decision.

ABC Appeals Board decision on Sidelines, Aug. 16, 2019 by Mad River Union on Scribd

"I'm working with my team of attorneys," Costanzo said, declining further comment.


Related posts